RAV Clears Environmental Assessment Office
RAV Clears Environmental Assessment Office
Submitted by james on Thu, 2005-06-09 12:11. RAV LineThe Environmental Assessment office Cleared the RAV line's proposal for a cut and cover tunnel down Cambie.
This was of course no surprise. It is pretty clear that the issue only went back to the Assessment office to prevent it from becoming and election issue during the Provincial election.
I really think that RAV should offer some sort of compensation for some of the businesses in the area. Or at least offer some services to help those businesses out.
While I think it is true that for many of the businesses the increased access that the RAV line will provide will increase their business in the long term, some businesses wont be able to survive the reduction in traffic that the construction will surely cause.
I tend to agree that outright subsidy of the businesses is not a good precedent and could be extremely difficult to do. However, RAV Co and InTransit have a lot of leverage and could surely use some of that to help the businesses out. Some things they could do:
- Increase the amount of free parking in the areas effected by construction by using allowing more parking in the residential areas during the daytime, working with parking lot owners, and other spaces,
- Provide information about how to visit the various businesses that are effected in weekly bulletins, Newspaper advertising, on their webpage etc. They should name the effected businesses how you can continue to visit them and give them some space for promotion in these publications.
- Work with the property owners to renegotiate some leases to allow lower lease rates during the construction period with higher ones afterwards to reflect the expected business cycle.
Any other ideas? contribute them below.
RAV
pay no income tax untill it's complete
Help the right businesses???
Are you suggesting that the businesses not pay income tax during the construction (or maybe just be able to defer all income tax payable during construction).
I think deferring the taxes could be reasonable. However, if businesses really will do as poorly as the doRAVright coalition believes, there wouldn't be any taxes to defer. The businesses that this would help the most are those that are least effected by the construction.

Georgia Straight Article
The Georgia Straight had an article about a business that is closing shop supposedly because of the RAV line.
Obviously at this point, her closing up shop and bankruptcy is not really directly because of the RAV line. Not a single car has been stopped from going up Cambie because of RAV. She is blaiming her business failure on the anticipation of failing during the RAV construction.
She claims that she would have been satisfied with getting a $20,000 grant to move her business, and she is planning on sueing RAV to try and get compensation. I think it is pretty obvious that paying businesses to move away would have been a pretty stupid way of trying to deal with the problem. Now you have a bunch of empty storefronts, and a bunch of very upset landlords. The businesses that remained behind would find it much more difficult.
The article seems like a desparte attempt to blame RAV for a business failure that had already failed fine on its own...